Community-scale impact analysis grounded in peer-reviewed studies. All conclusions trace back to the published research listed below.
Comprehensive analysis documenting an estimated $24.15M aggregate impact across 555 nearby homes. Two-tier Rajapaksa framework with high-desert calibration.
Map showing impact zones with the Rajapaksa two-tier framework applied to all analyzed viewpoints.
Newer V1 of the impact zone map. May supersede the entry above. Source: ~/Dropbox/TOWER OPPOSITION/Property Value/Placitas_Impact_Zone_Map_Rajapaksa_V1.jpg
Property-value impact analysis as a slide deck. Source: ~/Dropbox/TOWER OPPOSITION/Property Value/Placitas_Property_Value_Impact_V1.pptx
Reanalysis of the Rajapaksa framework as applied to Placitas. Source: ~/Dropbox/TOWER OPPOSITION/Property Value/Placitas_Rajapaksa_Reanalysis_V1.pptx
Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. 9.78% impact for visible towers; 0.72 km impact threshold. Study area: Mobile County, Alabama.
Up to 15% impact within 200 meters. Study area: Brisbane, Australia. Provides the proximity-override tier in the Placitas model.
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. Warsaw 5G study: zero impact β because towers were invisibly roof-mounted in dense urban settings with masking ambient noise. The opposite of Placitas conditions.
