The Tier-1 spine of the opposition: the proposed site is at priority 6 of 6 on the County's siting ladder, and the application doesn't include the comprehensive 4-mile inventory or the shared-use correspondence the rules require.
Existing tower locations within 4 miles of the proposed site, drawn from FCC Antenna Structure Registration data — the inventory the application's own materials should have included.
The actual lease — supports the "owner-driven placement" argument: the corner placement was chosen to preserve the rest of the parcel for retail development, not for technical or hardship reasons. Source: ~/Dropbox/TOWER OPPOSITION/Real Estate Docs/Sun State Towers Lease Agreement.pdf
The underlying real estate transaction with annotation. Source: ~/Dropbox/TOWER OPPOSITION/Real Estate Docs/Real Estate Contract Huslig (BV comments).pdf
